Blog

Welcome

This is the blog for professional photographers, and those who aspire to be. Our aim is to help professional photographers build long-term, sustainable careers.
loading facebook page
I've been following the latest hate war against David Jay and PASS with interest. Here's the post that started it all, and here's what it's all about. I like my commercial messages straight, so I wish David didn't come on to you like a TV evangelist, but that aside, he's not wrong about everything. So because we hate hate speech of every kind I thought I'd explain what he's right about before I get into where we part company... David is promoting what he calls Shoot & Share, which in practice means a photographer shoots an event and hosts the images on David's service, PASS, where the customers have access to the high-res files and are invited to share them with their friends as well. If you were a courtroom attorney and demanding a Yes-No answer to, "Do you agree with Shoot and Share?" I'd have to say, "Yes I do." Why? For three reasons. First, because social sharing is a reality, whether we like it or not. Even if you think people passing your images around is a form of piracy, that's better than being ignored, which is what happens to most of us. Second, because social sharing is a powerful new form of word of mouth, the most authentic kind of marketing - if it's "marketing" at all. You post images on your website. Your customers share them with their friends. Their friends tell their friends, and that's where your next bookings come from. Third, because Shoot & Share is a big step up the social scale from Shoot & Burn, the loser's way to sell wedding photography. (Isn't it ironic that Shoot and Burners are delivering their pictures on thumb drives now, just as PCs are going the way of DVD players, and everything's going wireless? And isn't it tragic that their customers have spent good money on photos that will almost certainly disappear without trace?) So we don't disagree entirely with David Jay, but if the prosecuting attorney will allow us a more nuanced response than yes or no, in my next post I'll explain why, despite everything I've said, if you're thinking of building a career in social photography, David Jay's Shoot & Share model might be bad for your health. Might. We have people doing it on Workspace right now. As I say, it's not all bad, it just might not be enough. For some at least it won't be enough. Cheers, Ian
This entry was posted in , by Admin | Leave a Comment
Martin
on
August 16, 2013, 10:23 am
said:
From time to time, a booking might come from absentee social sharing, such as Facebook, but that's rare it's like expecting a call because you got a credit for a published image. What's far more natural is for bookings to come from the discussion that happens when clients receive their art, or display it at home. A conversation happens naturally and the experience and results are is discussed while the art is enjoyed in its full, tangible form. That's just human nature. I'd add sharing on your phone at coffee to the list of in-person sharing, but as the image is likely to be out there at this point and it is assumed the friend has already seen it so this often doesn't happen.
 
Reply
Lowest common denominator
on
August 20, 2013, 5:47 am
said:
[…] week I wrote about the latest David Jay hate war, and said that if a courtroom attorney asked whether I agreed […]
 
Reply
Ingrid
on
August 17, 2013, 1:52 am
said:
People love to share photos. Anything that makes that easy is value added to the customer. While the sharing is marketing for the photographer, it also something people want. Because they do want it, it can be good value added to a package that includes something like an album. The online sharing satisfies an instant gratification, but will be forgotten long term. The album is long term and separates the photography from people who only upload photos. Everyone wants files. It's hard to navigate the best way to do it, but everyone wants them.
 
Reply
Ian Baugh
on
August 16, 2013, 5:23 am
said:
Hi Martin, I think we agree. IMHO it's a hierarchy. I totally agree that sharing real touch-and-feel art (prints, books etc) is best. One-on-one sharing (of images on your phone over coffee etc) is good but not *that* good. Checking out friends-of-friends' images, or images on a photographer's site is not as powerful. But it's still real authentic social proof. (Hey, this photogr shoots a lot work, and people like what she does.)
 
Reply
This Guy
on
December 24, 2013, 7:58 am
said:
Sharing is great, but why do I have to pay David Jay's "Pass" company to do something I can charge my clients for? Better yet, why would I let them cheapen my hard work by selling a photo for $1 and then taking half of the profit for doing ... what exactly?
 
Reply