The Junction


Archive for July, 2009

Manual sorting is a super easy drag-and-drop solution to sorting your images and templates in the Event Window.

We’ve added a new option to the ‘Sort By’ drop down list, called “Manual”. It’s the default option when the window opens.

picture-13

While this option is selected you can manually drag and drop images or templates to new locations within a Group or Collection. Very handy if the default order options (eg date-and-time or file name) don’t work for you.

Here’s an example…

Say you wanted the B&W image to be the third image in the sequence.

picture-4

With Manual selected in the Sort By menu, drag and drop the image between the last two images.

picture-2

Now you can re-sort by date-and-time, filename or whatever, then go back to Manual where Photojunction will remember the changes you made.

Cheers, Nigel

There are dozens of album design tools on the market, and almost none of them can be used to free-design matted albums.

The exceptions are PJ and two others. A few more have workarounds where you drag and drop images on to templates that match pre-designed mats … but that’s hardly creative.

Why do so few programs have this ability?

First, it’s quite hard. ;) Hard to create a layout on the fly, and simultaneously capture all the data to create both the prints and the mat. And hard, when you’ve got the data, to ensure that the resulting layout meets all the album vendor’s requirements … and can actually be manufactured!

It gives most people a headache just thinking about it.

Second, matted albums no longer feature on most photographer’s radar. Not everybody agrees that’s a good thing, and that may be an opportunity for bespoke album makers and their clients. Provided their software can capitalise on it.

There is a lot to choosing an album design tool but the power to design pretty much any album out there is surely important.

Warm regards, Danny

We read this by Finao recently :

InDesign is becoming more and more popular for album design work, however, we do not recommend it for new designers. Unless you know your stuff with InDesign and consider yourself an InDesign master, don’t use it… There are more variables and settings to check with InDesign. Wrong settings and improperly sized linked images are easy to miss and are common problems we have seen with inexperienced (and even some experienced) users… We have also experienced more problems with file corruptions during upload with improperly exported or converted InDesign files. Let this serve as your warning, use InDesign at your own risk.

Finao have an excellent point, and you won’t be surprised if I agree and maybe add to what they’re saying. ;)

InDesign and Photoshop don’t design “real” physical products (and generally the tools that are based on them don’t either). Instead they’re entirely dependent on the user to create a design that complies with all the producer’s requirements, whether that be a book, a magazine, a poster, an album or whatever.

One of the major problems album manufacturers can have is when the orders they receive are not “ready for production”. Here’s a great example.

I believe photographers are familiar with the problem with respect to labs, but in fact it’s far more difficult for album manufacturers. As one example, Asuka’s File Checker is an attempt to address it, by stopping users from sending problematic orders.

And that’s why PJ has built-in presets for both labs and album manufacturers. Not very sexy but very practical.

There is a lot to choosing an album design tool but getting orders to your album manufacturer and lab that are accurate, complete and ready for production is an important consideration.

Warm regards, Danny

slideshow-optionsJohannes accused us of hiding our light under a bushel. Not very nice. Is it our fault his friend doesn’t know Remix can export HD slideshows? Probably, so here goes.

Remix can export HD slide shows … or iPhone slide shows … or … why not customise?

Just have a play with the Movie Size pop-up on the slide show settings window. My favourite is Custom, so I’m not stuck with the pre-sets.

Cheers, Ian

Johannes posted on Queensberry Connects to encourage people to upgrade to the new beta, and got this comment:

So what about all the quirky bugs, even in the latest version? Also running latest version of OS X. Used to work in the software industry, and this program is buggy!

Fair comment, although we may need to agree to differ ;)

Here’s our take on it (I also posted about reliability while Remix was still in beta).

Version 1.25 in PJ Support’s experience is very stable. The few bugs in it (no deal breakers) were fixed in v1.26 … which is a beta with heaps of new features … and inevitably, a few new bugs!

If you want stability, stick with the (latest) final version. It’ll be stable and pretty bug-free. But if you stick to finals there’s a bit of a dilemma: any bugs there are won’t be fixed for you until the next final comes out. Unless there are deal breakers of course.

If you want to play with the latest features go for the betas, expect a few bugs – and prompter bug fixes – and accept our heartfelt thanks for helping to make the program even better.

Here’s a real-world observation. There are a few good reasons why PJ may be buggier than some: small user base … very ambitious software … cross-platform … constant development … Which of these would you have us give up on?

I’m proud of what Team PJ have done, and we’re all very grateful to our users, who’ve helped them do it with their feedback and patience. Check out the release notes and look at what they’ve achieved.

Cheers, Ian