The Junction


Archive for March, 2009

n637021082_1226600_4053jpg

Pavan and Sara

Have you heard that funny story Danny tells about how far PJ has come? How it was originally developed by a one guy in a cupboard? And that poor guy had to answer the phone as well? Stretching it a bit, Danny, but not much…

Anyway, if you’ve been with PJ since Day One you’ll remember that guy, Pavan … and maybe how worried you were that the wheels would fall off when he left to further his career! Well the wheels didn’t fall off (thank you Sepehr) but we’ve kept in touch with Pavan, who’s an awesome young man.

Recently we were privileged to support (enthusiastically) his application for Oxford University’s MBA programme, and we’ve just heard he has been accepted.

Congratulations, Pavan – you’re the man.

Cheers, Ian, Stephen, Danny and all Team PJ.

Pavan’s at vyas.pavan@gmail.com and on Facebook

From time to time I’m asked for advice about internet connection speeds and pricing plans, so here goes…

  • Most internet packages are lame (especially in New Zealand; but our ISPs learned their tricks from your ISPs, so we’re not alone).
  • Most internet packages assume you’re a consumer, but…
  • You’re not a consumer, you’re a producer (so you need upload speed, not just download speed).

Here’s what’s lame. Most ISPs show their speed (how quickly you can download and/or upload information) in kilobits (kb), not kilobytes (kB) (or megabits instead of megabytes) simply to make the numbers look bigger. To convert kilobytes to kilobits, you multiply by 8, and 128 kilobits per second sounds better than 16 Kilobytes per second, doesn’t it?

How to calculate typical upload times

Suppose you need to upload a 5MB (megabyte) jpg to your lab.

5MB = 5120KB
5120KB / 16 KBps = 320 seconds

So 5 minutes 20 seconds is your absolute best case scenario. Unfortunately though, that’s theoretical (another example of loose standards). In my experience it’s realistic to expect 50% of maximum capacity, so I would double the time, which means:

  • 10 minutes to upload that 5MB jpg
  • 16 hours to upload a print order of 100 jpegs
  • 48 hours to upload a 1.5 gigabyte album order!

That’s asking for trouble. Disconnections, hibernation, and flakey wireless connections all add to the time … and explain why we spent so much time building “resume” functions into LabFTP – so you don’t need to start again!

I used that 128 Kbps upload speed as my example because it’s the speed you’re promised when you buy the $39.95/month “most popular” plan from NZ’s most popular ISP.

Something else to bear in mind: upload and download speeds are not the same: ISPs routinely cap upload speeds. 128Kbps uploading may be OK for (some) consumers, but it’s useless to a producer like you.

I want to encourage you to evaluate your internet package and do your own sums. Consider how long things should take to upload, or download for that matter.

Cheers, Danny

PS: Here’s a site where you can test your own speeds (and do your own upload time calculations). Note, it gives the results honestly, in kilobytes, not kilobits!

Danny and Nigel have now finished a movie about the latest release (see below).

To be honest, I didn’t feel that excited about v1.25 … until I saw the movie. The new features don’t sound that exciting in print, but I reckon the movie will wake you up to the possibilities. If you want to upgrade from Retro … store your files where you like … use Remix over a network … organise or use templates … there’s plenty here for you.


(make sure to click ‘full screen’ – bottom right hand corner – after the movie starts)

Of course if you’re not into movies you could read my notes I guess ;)

1. First introduced in the beta release v1.22, the “portable projects” feature means you can now easily move projects around between different computers, or use Remix across a network. Each project folder includes all the data Remix needs to work on a particular job, including the low-res proxies. We made a separate movie about this feature at the time of the last beta release.


2. You can now position apertures by entering coordinates: select an aperture or apertures, right
click and position them by entering a distance to the left, top, bottom or right of the layout.

3. You can now import Retro .PJF files (under the File menu). Take care: we have tested this thoroughly, but please let us know if you discover any problems. TWO KNOWN ISSUES: Retro’s lines are not supported by Remix; apertures rotated in Retro will need to be adjusted after importing into Remix.

4. The Open in Editor and PS Actions buttons now allow you to open and edit a cropped, resized duplicate of the original image so you can (eg) add vignettes.

5. You can now move templates from one collection to another by dragging and dropping.

6. Shift-dragging templates (which adds a group of apertures rather than the layout) no longer deletes the existing apertures on the layout.

7. So that Remix can more accurately reflect album suppliers’ requirements, the total number of layouts allowed in album now includes the total permissible flips and wings. Remix will warn you if you add more layouts, wings and/or flips than allowed, but not allow you to

9. Images can now be deleted from a Collection when reviewing full screen.

10. Asuka book exported layouts are now named correctly.

11. Images can now be double clicked on the album design window to view full them screen.

12. Selecting any QBY resources in Check For Updates will now download all available
QBY resources.

13. Vendors using the Supplier version only: Mat Cutter registration is now required to cut mats, and you can now add a new Studio in the Supplier Version.

14. Between them, v1.22 (beta) and 1.25 also include 40 bug fixes, which you can read about in the release notes.

Cheers, Ian

Well, we made Photojunction free … now what?

After yesterday’s new final we’re finalising the development schedule for the next few months.

It’s always been our goal to make Photojunction the software of choice for wedding and portrait photographers, and we really appreciate the support we get from the thousands of photographers who use it.

But we do also recognise that there are four areas where people struggle, or where we can see strong opportunities for improvement.

1, While most people fly through the set up procedure, some people struggle. Maybe it doesn’t work as they expect, and therefore the task looks a little overwhelming. Our goal is to make getting started really easy and straight forward.

2, Some people think of Photojunction as a tool for matted albums, and although it does a brilliant job of laying out digital albums we recognise that there are some cool things we could do to make it both more obvious and even more powerful.

3, Once the album is complete, some people get overwhelmed with “what next?” – how to export, how to order, how to FTP their files. This area will get an overhaul in the next few months to make it very simple and straight forward.

4, We anxiously want to retire Photojunction Retro but realise there is still functionality that Remix doesn’t have, eg the portrait and proof sheet modules.

So our question is, what next?

If you use other portrait sales software such as Pro Select what do you love about it? We want to bring this functionality forward from Retro … but only if it’s world class.

Are there things not on the list above that you think are more urgent?

If you prefer other template software, what is it that you think we could do better?

Again, thanks so much for your support so far. Tell your friends we’ve started a discussion here on Facebook about how to make Photojunction even better. We hope you’ll contribute, we’d love your opinion.

Cheers, Stephen

We’ve launched a new version of Photojunction today, version 1.25. It’s a final and has plenty of new features and fixes which you can read about in the release notes. If you haven’t been installing our beta releases we recommend you check out this post about v1.22. It introduces “portable projects” and includes a brief tutorial movie.

We’ll publish a more thorough post and a movie about the release early next week. Meantime, enjoy the new software!

Cheers, Danny

Photojunction finally made it to Facebook.

We like to think we’re early adopters but we’ve been behind the eight ball with this. Time just hasn’t stood still for a while!

Since you’ve probably beaten us to it, it’ll be super easy to link up. If you’re already on Facebook just click here to become a Photojunction fan-boy (as Danny would say).

Team PJ will be hanging out on our page so please chat, leave comments, ask questions or give us feedback. We’ll also be updating it with the latest news, posts and newsletters so you’ll always be plugged into to what’s happening at PJ.

Hope to see you there.

Cheers, Nigel

PS remember Danny and Stephen are on Twitter too. To follow them add:

Danny: twitter.com/PJ_danny
Stephen: twitter.com/stephenbaugh

We were talking today about system requirements for Photojunction. Someone had suggested that users need at least 3GB of RAM to run PJ Remix and Photoshop at the same time – which of course they do when they’re creating hi-res exports. On our website however we say 1GB is OK, and 2+GB is recommended.

As someone who’d only just created a set of layouts for a demo on my bog-standard MacBook Pro with 2GB of RAM, and thought, “Gee, that was quick”, I was surprised at the comment. Especially since all PJ is doing during export is feeding Photoshop a script.

So we talked, and thought, Yes, in the real world, the more RAM the better. I did add more to my old machine. But as I’d just confirmed PJ doesn’t need it. We also like to upgrade our computers every couple of years, because the world is moving on. But many of our staff work on hardware that’s older than that.

What else? We could all spend more on a longer list, but in today’s economy we do need to work out whether we really need to spend the money.

Cheers, Ian

NB. A small percentage of Windows users have memory related crashes and the more memory you have, the fewer of those crashes. Having said that our development environment has just been upgraded, and they have promised me personally that they’ve addressed this inherited bug! – Danny

Our advice about exporting your high-res layouts from PJ for printing has always been to step away from the computer. Photoshop is a little sensitive when running scripts and you’re likely to trip it up if you work at the same time. Go have a coffee and it’ll be finished when you get back.

Cheers, Ian

Danny and Stephen say this was a very regular dialogue at WPPI and FOCUS…

I love it. How much?

It’s free.

You mean I get a free trial?

No, it’s free.

Yeah, but that’s just the Lite version, right?

No – honestly – it’s free.

OK, but only to Queensberry clients?

We decided to make it free to everyone.

So… why? What’s the catch?

Well, we’re building a community around the software… and we want you on our mailing list. Plus there is a charge if you want one-on-one support. And one day we might offer you other stuff that’s not free.

But if I never spend a dollar with you it’s free?

That’s right. The reality is we’re doing it anyway. Queensberry needs free software for its own clients, and like it or not, many of them use multiple vendors. We’re helping them solve their real world problems.

Cheers, Ian

Doing our recent webinars, Danny and I were surprised how many people weren’t aware of the colour picker in PJ Remix.

When you’re designing a digital page layout you can change the background colour of the page to any colour you’d like. This is especially useful if you want the background to match the edge of the image like this one.

picture-41

colorpickermac

Mac Colour Picker

Vista Colour Picker

Vista Colour Picker

This is how it works on Mac. In the Layout Tools pallet under Background Colour click on the swatch to bring up the operating system’s colour picker. Click on the magnifying glass (top left) to select a colour from anywhere on your layout (or anywhere on your screen!) and hit OK to set that colour as the background of your album layout.

I wish it was that easy on Windows, but the XP/Vista Colour Picker doesn’t grab colours like that. You need to enter the values yourself. I’d use the Photoshop Colour Picker to read the colour but maybe you have another utility that could do that.

  • In Remix, select on the image with the colour you want to grab and click Open in Editor to open it in Photoshop.
  • In Photoshop click Foreground Colour, select the colour and read the RGB values.
  • Back in Remix, click on Background Colour to launch the XP/Vista Colour Picker, click on Define Custom Colours, enter the RGB values you read in Photoshop and and hit OK to set that colour as the background of your album layout.
  • When you’re done, close the image in Photoshop without saving.

HTH, Nigel