Queensberry Connects


Some people had an unexpected take on what I said in my recent email about being “generous” with clients.

All I meant was that in an age where images are “free”, maybe you should ensure your clients get a lot of them – a lot more than an album-full! I also suggested that the better they bought the more generous you should be.

What I didn’t explain was that I’d detail everything in my pricelist so that my bonuses, if you want to call them that, would add value to my “better” and “best” “packages”.

Some people thought I was suggesting you look for ways you could SURPRISE your clients with your generosity.

That wasn’t my intention but it’s an excellent idea. Although being generous isn’t something you think about, is it? It’s just something you do, or are.

If you’re going to surprise people it needs to be real … not just over-delivering … not just trotting out the same thing for everyone, which they’ll soon learn to expect.

It needs to be a reflection of both you and them.

I’m writing this at the beach with four friends. If I wanted to impress them with a little surprise I wouldn’t buy them the same gift. I’d give them something that showed that I know them as individuals.

Every successful gift demonstrates your insight into the person you’re giving to. That’s why books and music are so hard if you don’t know the person, and why your surprise bonus needs to be individual.

Cheers, Ian

PS Having said all that the chocolate dipped Magnum Classics I just brought back from the shops went down OK.

PPS I don’t think I’d treat the high-res files as my generous surprise.

 

People who like this post would also like:

  • One happy couple
  • How much are your images worth?
  • Innovative album marketing idea
  • In light of Ian’s newsletter a few days ago (well worth a read!), here’s a timely little story from one of our clients reinforcing what he was saying…

    From Paul Maven

    I did a wedding fair two weeks ago. One of the other photographers came over to have a little spy. “Oh, Queensberry” he uttered, looking down his nose at my samples. “Too expensive them, can’t sell them”.

    Later, he came back and I asked him how things were going. He told me that he had two almost definite bookings. One on Lindisfarne Island and one on the 29th December.

    “Actually”, I told him, “those two couples have just booked with me, because ‘nothing we have seen so far compares to the Queensberry books“.

    I confirmed four bookings at that fair and all of them stated that the quality of the books as a major reason why.

    No price on quality, I suppose.

    Cheers, Nigel

     

    People who like this post would also like:

  • One happy couple
  • How much are your images worth?
  • New Year resolution – get on Facebook
  • About time we got ourselves onto Facebook don’t you think? Yeah, us too…

    If you haven’t already found us, we’d love you to come shoot the breeze with us on our new Facebook page:

    Find us on Facebook

    We’ll keep it updated with new blog posts, featured albums, mentions and videos… plus whatever else we think you might enjoy.

    Feel free to comment, ask questions or post photos.

    We’re looking forward to getting this conversation started and would love you to spread the word! :)

    Cheers, Nigel

    PS check out the Photojunction Facebook page and connect with Ian, NigelDanny and Stephen on twitter.

     

    People who like this post would also like:

  • Off to the UK
  • Raising the bar
  • We’re coming to SWPP
  • Photojunction version 1.36 introduced a change to the way in which Photojunction sends your orders to Queensberry.

    Your order is not sent to Queensberry until you hit ‘Upload Now’ to send us the bundle of files associated with it. This is necessary whether you’re printing with us or not. It means Queensberry will receive your order in one send, behind-the-scenes automation will be improved, the amount of time Order Processing spends on your orders reduced – and you’ll get your albums faster.

    The steps in Photojunction to sending your order are exactly the same, but, to repeat, whether you’re printing or not, it’s important to hit the ‘Upload Now’ button when you reach this stage of the process…

    If you do decide to ‘Upload Later’, Photojunction will remind you of this change to procedure before allowing you to continue.

    Cheers, Nigel

     

    People who like this post would also like:

  • Keep it simple – Album Assembly
  • Keep it simple – our design Service
  • Full Colour Service request
  • Taken a bird’s eye view of your competition lately? Here’s how photographers show up in Google Maps. Little red dots, all the same.


    Auckland                                                                   Sydney


    New York                                                                  London

    Seth talked about the ubiquity of competition a few days ago, pointing out that competition is everywhere, we just forget to notice it. Let me add to that … or respond to it.

    If your little red dot looks like every other little red dot, and it does, you can be sure there’s only one question the consumer will think to ask … How much?

    Which I guess is why Ian reckons that in business there’s two options, differentiate or drop your prices.

    We’ve all got to fight for our patch. The question is, What are you doing to win the competition for attention? So that more people search for your name instead of “photographer” … and get one red dot, not a skin disease.

    You’re not safe from competition anywhere, not even in little Westport … in the remotest region of New Zealand … at the edge of the world.

    Cheers, Nigel

    (Thanks to Hooman for the Google maps idea)

     

    People who like this post would also like:

  • First impressions
  • How much are your images worth?
  • Innovative album marketing idea
  • It’s that time of year when we take stock, make resolutions and ask questions … like how can we make this year a winner? Are there too many photographers? Why do we ask our competitors for advice? What can we learn from musicians?

    And the big one: How much are our images worth? Sadly, that’s not just about how good they are or how much time we spend on them in post-production.

    The newsletter is below. Let us know what you think by leaving a comment here or emailing Ian directly.

    Cheers, Nigel

    How much are your images worth?

    We received this present from our design consultants, Alt Group. It marked the end of a pretty ordinary 2009 for many of us. A “lean year” indeed. But now it’s 2010, and that time of year when we take stock, make resolutions and ask questions:

    How can we make this year a winner? Are there too many photographers? Why do we ask our competitors for advice? What can we learn from musicians? How much are our images worth?

    We could also ask if the recession is over … but we’re sick of it so let’s not! (there’s a post coming though).

    Actually the year started well. SWPP holds a trade show each January in London and this year a “very tired but happy” crew were talked hoarse on the Queensberry stand. (A thousand thanks to Jo and Rebecca.) Overall there was a much more positive, up-beat feeling than 2009, with some clients still concerned about bookings for 2010 but others already fully booked.

    And there’s more optimism in this story, which suggests there’ll be more weddings in the UK this year than last. Underlying that is the interesting notion that there tend to be more weddings in recession years as people seek greater stability in times of uncertainty. Pity it’s over!

    But for what it’s worth, all the above simply reflects the positive vibe Sonya’s account reps report.

    Having said that not everyone is likely to prosper.

    Recently David Ziser asked, are there too many wedding photographers these days? (Check out the series on DigitalProTalk, rolling out now.)

    I’d say of course there are. We’ve been in this business for forty years. All that time we’ve been told there are too many photographers, and it’s always been true. Here are my most confident predictions for the next five years:

    • The death rate will continue at an appalling 100% (actually I stole that one).

    • Many of your backyard/weekend warrior competitors will have given up.

    • They will have been replaced by a new lot.

    • New cameras will make it easier for anyone to take a half-decent picture.

    • Many people will make a good living using skills they share with most people on the planet (writing, cooking, music, photography).

    So there is nothing new under the sun. The real question is, in a competitive universe what do you need to do to end up among the winners?

    Google maps - "photographers" NYC

    Most people respond to their competitors by copying them, and I’ve never understood why (it means you’re always just another little red dot).

    “Copying” shows up two ways.

    The first is just that – copying – everything from pricing and “packages” to choice of albums and the latest money shots and Photoshop tricks. The second is asking your competitors for advice. And isn’t that what we’re doing when we do as they say on the online forums?

    What’s wrong with that? Well again, there are too many photographers. Many, maybe even most, of those around you today will either give up or struggle on making an inadequate living. Chances are good that what most people are doing is the wrong thing to do if you want a long and successful career.

    In my opinion you need a better idea, not someone else’s idea.

    Take Alt again. The leaning bottle presentation is Alt personified, a simple, witty idea beautifully executed. Zero branding yet it screams their name. And deservedly wins them international recognition.

    In business there are two options, differentiate or drop your prices. If you copy, you’re going with option two … and an average income. Who needs that?

    The US Wedding Report said encouragingly, “Couples spent 16% more on a wedding photographer in 2009 ($1,740) compared to 2008 ($1,500)”. Well the trend’s in the right direction but my immediate reaction was, Gee I hope our clients are doing better than that! And since it’s an average, doesn’t it mean a few photographers earned a lot more … and most somewhat less?

    If you can’t think of five things that differentiate you, there’s probably only one. You’re cheaper. Respond to your competitors but don’t let them define you.

    If you have a great idea your clients love, why spread it around? Not in your own neighbourhood anyway.

    I reckon photographers could learn something from musicians.

    We all know paying for your music these days is voluntary. Files can be downloaded and copied ad infinitum … which is why in 2008 Nine Inch Nails allowed their new album to be downloaded legally for free.

    That same album was the best-selling MP3 album of 2008 at Amazon.com, and the band made a fortune selling limited edition sets with extras like Blu-ray discs and deluxe packaging.

    For photographers and musicians digital changes everything because the marginal cost of digital objects (music files, image files) is Zero. Which is why the default price on the Internet is Free.

    Like your local singer-songwriter we have to learn to give stuff away to make money.

    The good news is that you don’t have the same problem as NIN because your photographs aren’t out there until you say so. Which hopefully is after you get paid.

    If I was a photographer I’d want a reputation for being really good, really engaging, really understanding and really generous. Once I’ve been paid.

    I’d offer my clients and show my work in something out of the ordinary and undeniably desirable: a Queensberry for example, to project and reinforce my high-end status (because I need to achieve a high average sale per client).

    I wouldn’t post any (many) photos online until I’d been paid (musicians don’t have that luxury).

    But once I had my money I’d be really generous. Files, slideshows, DVDs whatever. Those things that everybody wants but nobody wants to pay much for because their default price is Free. How generous I was would depend on how generous they were. Bought well? Stand back, here come the goodies!

    I (might) make my Queensberry an optional extra. Selling one would make my day – but even without a sale it would have helped justify my prices.

    Let’s face it, high prices mean less potential customers. But down in the scrum there’s more competition, more work and less money, unless you are one of the few who can play and enjoy the volume game.

    We eat our own cooking here

    We have similar competitive challenges. I could even try the line on you that it’s tougher than ever out there! According to Jo there were a “ridiculous number” of digital and coffee table book companies at SWPP (same old same old) and some new matted album products, some of them “really awful”.

    You can see Jo has a clear idea of what we stand for, and hopefully you do too.

    • We can’t help striving to be the best (we’re very serious about that).

    • We’re OK with questions like this, off Twitter: “Anyone know where to go for a good wedding book, better than blurb and not as pricey as Queensberry?”

    • We believe in timeless classics not three-month taste. Restrained not fabulicious. Clean design not faux traditional.

    • We believe your photos are the stars, not us, and really, not your photos but the stories they tell.

    • We’re comfortable that most people don’t have a Queensberry. If they did our albums would have less value. And that’s critical because something’s broken if our albums don’t, directly or indirectly, add to your bottom line.

    Bottom line

    Sadly, how much your images are worth does not depend on their quality or how much time you spend on them in post-production. Instead it depends on how you market and sell them. Follow the crowd (be a little red dot) and you’re a price taker not a price setter. Stand out from the crowd, be noteworthy, and you have a chance of doing better.

    This year, as for the last forty, helping you to stand out is exactly what we’ll be striving to do.

    We’d love to hear from you, whether you agree or disagree with what I’m saying. Please comment on the blog or leave me an email. And of course if you need any help with sales or marketing do contact your account manager.

    Cheers, Ian

    Find us on Facebook

     

    People who like this post would also like:

  • Generosity
  • No price on quality
  • Winning the competition for attention
  • Here’s why our New Year’s resolution is to get on Facebook.

    Besides being a long time Queensberry client, Australian photographer Greg Mace is a friend and all-round good guy … and we’re not the only ones who think so.

    To prove that all you have to do is click on Greg’s new Facebook page. Better yet, friend him and click “Just Fans”.

    In June ‘09 6.1m Australians (out of 21m) visited Facebook. In fact three out of four Aussies visited a social networking site of some sort. Same here in New Zealand: almost a quarter of us have used Facebook.

    Those are big numbers, and of course once people start hanging out online they have every reason to keep coming back.

    Cheers, Ian

    PS The downside of Facebook pages is that, like blogs, you have to work at them. Hey Nigel … here’s some more work for you – Ed.

     

    People who like this post would also like:

  • Innovative album marketing idea
  • Winning the competition for attention
  • How do I decide?

  • He arrived at our place at 11am. We (the boys) were all in the lounge playing Playstation. He didn’t mind that. In fact he quite liked it.

    He clicked away. I lost the game. We played another.

    Forgetting he was even there, I found him later in my room shooting my hanging suit, the rings on the dresser, my arrangement of perfumes and our shoes. Just doing his thing.

    Then he turned up at Kayla’s place and made himself at home… ideal.

    He shot the girls getting ready – the chaos, the nerves, the details, the family. I wasn’t there but that’s what the photos told me.

    Mrs Mother-in-law felt a little embarrassed when he wanted to shoot out the back … in front of the only gardens she hadn’t had spruced up for the big day. Looking at the resulting photos though, she was glad she didn’t stop him.

    When he arrived at the ceremony I relaxed a little… Maybe it was because he knows how it works. He’s been to so many. Not sure. But seeing him there smiling at me from the back of the garden calmed me.

    The bridal photos were a breeze. He’s got this way of explaining where he wants us to stand, the expression of love he’s looking for, the emotion he wants to capture. It’s poetic. And the girls loved it…

    He tells us we’re doing well, so we feel good. I know he’s doing most of the work in making us look good, but he doesn’t make you feel like that. It’s not about him – It’s about us.

    I left that night with a greater understanding that pointing and shooting is only half the art of being a great photographer.

    The other half is the art of interaction and presence. With the couple, the guests, the families, the venue. There’s a true art in having a couple express themselves in a way that allows you to get that beautiful shot. To, in seconds, relax a bunch of people you’ve never met before. To make taking the bridal photos just a special as any other part of the day.

    I feel, as I hope every couple feels about their photographer, that we had the most talented artist in the world shoot our wedding. Thanks Johannes.

    Cheers, Nigel

     

    People who like this post would also like:

  • Good vs great wedding photos
  • Photoshopping the soul
  • Album design – a simple tip
  • Wedding Photography and the Difference Between Good and Great Wedding Photos

    By David Freund

    A couple of days ago I was involved in an online discussion about wedding photography and what makes great, soulful wedding photographs. I thought I’d share my thoughts on what takes good wedding photos and makes them great wedding photos.

    A couple of years back I had 5 out of 6 straight weddings at the same location, same celebrant and same reception venue. My wife asked how I was able to do different work for each couple. It’s simple. I’m taking photos of two people on their wedding day. Not the venue, not the locations.

    I believe there are 3 kinds of wedding photo. Who was there, where it was and what happened.

    Old school ‘posed’ photography is often little more than a pictorial record of “who was there”.

    The stuff that gets published in magazines and makes photographers famous is “Where it was”. The magazines want to see details of the decorations and locations so other brides buy the magazines for their own wedding research. When they show photos of a bride it’s normally only so they can illustrate what the dress looks like.

    Great wedding photos are “What happened”. Photos that capture the unique nature of the couple. Their emotion, their personal connection.

    It’s why people put awful, blurry photos of them drunk and stupid on Facebook. Those images have true meaning to the people in them and they feel an emotional connection to the time and place they were taken.

    Same with wedding photos. The connection evoked by great wedding photos is one of love between the couple, their families and guests. Not a memory of a photographer telling them how to stand, where to look and how to kiss.

    I’m looking forward to taking more great wedding photos this year and putting together stunning wedding albums that become the treasured heirlooms of generations yet to come.

    Originally posted at davidfreund.com.au. Thanks David.

     

    People who like this post would also like:

  • The Artist
  • Photoshopping the soul
  • Album design – a simple tip
  • Somebody asked me for a way to create a better, more consistent look for their imagery.

    It was a trick question really. They were asking me how they might better use software to get consistency and classic styling.

    I thought about it and the answer was what we might call pre-emptive image manipulation.

    When I go to a flash restaurant that knows their stuff I am always amazed by what a great chef can do with the simplest ingredients.

    They start with fresh produce … the fresher the better (usually – cheeses are a different story). They don’t beat the living daylights out of it or season it beyond recognition. They use subtlety and finesse.

    It should be the same with our photography.

    Fresh ingredients, already rich in flavours of their own, cooked with a minimum of fuss and a flourish of presentation.

    If the produce is a bit ‘off’ the seasoning gets stronger and the cooking becomes a bit more intense.

    Pre-emptive image manipulation is keeping the image simple, lighting it, and getting the emotional energy happening, before it gets taken. All these things reduce the need for ‘overcooking’ later to get something special.

    Cheers, Johannes

     

    People who like this post would also like:

  • Photoshopping the soul
  • Good vs great wedding photos